THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNALS

CASE REF: 1030/15

CLAIMANT:	Mairead Hancock	

RESPONDENT:	 1. MP Estates UK
	2. Janice Richardson

DECISION

(A)	On the basis of the evidence heard I am satisfied that the claimant was employed by the second named respondent, and the first named respondent is dismissed from these proceedings

(B)	The claimant’s wages claim is well-founded and it is ordered that the second respondent shall pay to the claimant the sum of £ 1384.60 in respect of wages.

(C)	The claimant’s claim for notice pay is well-founded and it is ordered that the respondent shall pay to the claimant the sum of £ 300 in respect of notice pay.

Constitution of the Tribunal:

Employment Judge (sitting alone): Employment Judge McCaffrey 	

Appearances:

The claimant was self-represented.

The respondent was debarred from participating in the hearing because the respondent did not present a response within the relevant time-limit.

				CASE REF: 1030/15 

REASONS

1.	I announced my decision at the end of the hearing.  At the same time, I gave brief oral reasons for that decision.

2.	This Decision is based on the following information:

Gross weekly pay: £ 346.15

Net weekly pay: £ 300.00

Number of actual completed years of service: N/A

Age on date of dismissal: N/A

Multiplier (for redundancy pay): N/A

3.	This is a relevant decision for the purposes of the Industrial Tribunal (Interest) Order (Northern Ireland) 1990. 

Employment Judge: _________________________

Date and place of hearing: 30 July 2015, Belfast

Date decision recorded in register and issued to parties: